Best Known (82−61, 82, s)-Nets in Base 4
(82−61, 82, 34)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 82, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
(82−61, 82, 44)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (21, 82, 44)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 43)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 44, using
(82−61, 82, 93)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 82, 94)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (21, 81, 94)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(481, 94, S4, 60), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 69275 874266 393268 119010 487057 608395 667750 747969 739525 455872 / 8935 180875 > 481 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(481, 94, S4, 60), but