Best Known (104, 104+61, s)-Nets in Base 4
(104, 104+61, 139)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 165, 139)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 31, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 134, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 67, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 67, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 31, 9)-net over F4, using
(104, 104+61, 324)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (104, 165, 324)-net over F4, using
(104, 104+61, 7826)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 165, 7827)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 164, 7827)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 547 656088 491375 232892 409343 073580 196356 293549 329635 676694 495149 289064 593820 019279 756529 527957 487392 > 4164 [i]