Best Known (190−63, 190, s)-Nets in Base 4
(190−63, 190, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (127, 190, 195)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (126, 189, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 63, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 63, 65)-net over F64, using
(190−63, 190, 240)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(127, 190, 240)-net in base 4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (125, 190, 240)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 95, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 76, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 76, 120)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 95, 120)-net in base 16, using
(190−63, 190, 536)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (127, 190, 536)-net over F4, using
(190−63, 190, 19362)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (127, 190, 19363)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (127, 189, 19363)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 615861 574993 876243 144878 154843 176569 162025 069781 501949 365017 364207 676927 699742 426754 004874 349445 405694 455859 518080 > 4189 [i]