Best Known (187, 187+63, s)-Nets in Base 4
(187, 187+63, 553)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (187, 250, 553)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 40, 22)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 21)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 22, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 21)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (147, 210, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 70, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 70, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (9, 40, 22)-net over F4, using
(187, 187+63, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(187, 250, 648)-net in base 4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (185, 250, 648)-net in base 4, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (185, 252, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (185, 252, 648)-net in base 4, using
(187, 187+63, 2167)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (187, 250, 2167)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4250, 2167, F4, 63) (dual of [2167, 1917, 64]-code), using
- 1916 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (17, 8, 4, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 17 times 0, 1, 17 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 22 times 0, 1, 22 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 24 times 0, 1, 24 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 27 times 0, 1, 27 times 0, 1, 28 times 0, 1, 29 times 0, 1, 30 times 0, 1, 30 times 0, 1, 31 times 0, 1, 32 times 0, 1, 33 times 0, 1, 33 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 35 times 0, 1, 36 times 0, 1, 36 times 0, 1, 38 times 0, 1, 38 times 0, 1, 39 times 0, 1, 41 times 0, 1, 41 times 0, 1, 42 times 0, 1, 43 times 0, 1, 44 times 0, 1, 46 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(463, 64, F4, 63) (dual of [64, 1, 64]-code or 64-arc in PG(62,4)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 64 [i]
- 1916 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (17, 8, 4, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 17 times 0, 1, 17 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 22 times 0, 1, 22 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 24 times 0, 1, 24 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 27 times 0, 1, 27 times 0, 1, 28 times 0, 1, 29 times 0, 1, 30 times 0, 1, 30 times 0, 1, 31 times 0, 1, 32 times 0, 1, 33 times 0, 1, 33 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 35 times 0, 1, 36 times 0, 1, 36 times 0, 1, 38 times 0, 1, 38 times 0, 1, 39 times 0, 1, 41 times 0, 1, 41 times 0, 1, 42 times 0, 1, 43 times 0, 1, 44 times 0, 1, 46 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(463, 64, F4, 63) (dual of [64, 1, 64]-code or 64-arc in PG(62,4)), using
(187, 187+63, 283644)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (187, 250, 283645)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (187, 249, 283645)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 818405 568072 631986 652078 068634 162263 916437 829163 702312 438098 761682 013626 383230 642225 649395 412380 904660 110070 753290 682290 364777 508123 751977 109136 996832 > 4249 [i]