Best Known (174−65, 174, s)-Nets in Base 4
(174−65, 174, 135)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (109, 174, 135)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 32, 5)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- the rational function field F4(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (77, 142, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 71, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 71, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (0, 32, 5)-net over F4, using
(174−65, 174, 327)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (109, 174, 327)-net over F4, using
(174−65, 174, 7641)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (109, 174, 7642)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (109, 173, 7642)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 143 805579 741981 103677 806230 583132 298348 032894 322448 523732 803626 316876 776182 899908 061973 009451 686220 672550 > 4173 [i]