Best Known (175−65, 175, s)-Nets in Base 4
(175−65, 175, 139)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (110, 175, 139)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 33, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (77, 142, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 71, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 71, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 33, 9)-net over F4, using
(175−65, 175, 336)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (110, 175, 336)-net over F4, using
(175−65, 175, 7980)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (110, 175, 7981)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (110, 174, 7981)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 574 083765 868499 128772 404924 393056 472987 322756 914111 600788 139334 777097 709927 900140 427640 339238 142061 766397 > 4174 [i]