Best Known (96, 96+65, s)-Nets in Base 4
(96, 96+65, 130)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 161, 130)-net over F4, using
- 19 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (96, 180, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 90, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 90, 65)-net over F16, using
(96, 96+65, 235)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (96, 161, 235)-net over F4, using
(96, 96+65, 4339)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 161, 4340)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 160, 4340)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2 141544 683927 343709 854188 061768 762606 051874 809600 749495 053189 510855 368085 260829 712279 756108 979325 > 4160 [i]