Best Known (183, 183+66, s)-Nets in Base 4
(183, 183+66, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (183, 249, 531)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (179, 249, 531)-net over F4, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (179, 258, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (179, 258, 531)-net over F4, using
(183, 183+66, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(183, 249, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 83, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
(183, 183+66, 1722)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (183, 249, 1722)-net over F4, using
(183, 183+66, 153099)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (183, 249, 153100)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 818510 193967 306808 364036 768125 641848 072951 793389 120095 135593 756189 984442 116192 386094 681779 086281 308556 318218 170405 537232 956937 995704 885978 133771 656528 > 4249 [i]