Best Known (185, 185+66, s)-Nets in Base 4
(185, 185+66, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (185, 251, 531)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (179, 251, 531)-net over F4, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (179, 258, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (179, 258, 531)-net over F4, using
(185, 185+66, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(185, 251, 648)-net in base 4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (185, 252, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
(185, 185+66, 1796)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (185, 251, 1796)-net over F4, using
(185, 185+66, 166520)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (185, 251, 166521)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 13 095331 413252 127905 511046 108848 255483 470388 631083 030005 317011 480361 468234 494357 387915 714590 104628 249214 907918 653654 490328 825949 474090 079229 860057 061916 > 4251 [i]