MinT - Best Known (96−68, 96, s)-Nets in Base 4

Best Known (96−68, 96, s)-Nets in Base 4

(96−68, 96, 34)-Net over F₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (28, 96, 34)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 96, 34)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
    - T₅ from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₄ [i]

(96−68, 96, 42)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive

(28, 96, 42)-net in base 4, using

t-expansion [i] based on (27, 96, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
  - base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(96−68, 96, 55)-Net over F₄ — Digital

Digital (28, 96, 55)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 96, 55)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 54)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
    - Drinfeld modules of rank 1 [i]

(96−68, 96, 133)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s

There is no (28, 96, 134)-net in base 4, because

extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4⁹⁶, 134, S₄, 68), but
- the linear programming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 13 415429 160907 107206 554547 983777 229357 042751 669104 936574 374125 026137 749417 172951 220594 147328 / 1881 974022 768794 536713 134036 908875 > 4⁹⁶ [i]