Best Known (96, 96+68, s)-Nets in Base 4
(96, 96+68, 130)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 164, 130)-net over F4, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (96, 180, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 90, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 90, 65)-net over F16, using
(96, 96+68, 219)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (96, 164, 219)-net over F4, using
(96, 96+68, 3589)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 164, 3590)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 548 118852 498153 270080 351048 228299 546961 885592 428425 643276 565609 985284 338588 585718 302965 735432 364320 > 4164 [i]