Best Known (209−73, 209, s)-Nets in Base 4
(209−73, 209, 163)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 209, 163)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 51, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (85, 158, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 79, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 79, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (15, 51, 33)-net over F4, using
(209−73, 209, 208)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(136, 209, 208)-net in base 4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (135, 209, 208)-net in base 4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (135, 210, 208)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 105, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 84, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 84, 104)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 105, 104)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (135, 210, 208)-net in base 4, using
(209−73, 209, 484)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (136, 209, 484)-net over F4, using
(209−73, 209, 14298)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 209, 14299)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (136, 208, 14299)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 169445 806712 386640 481481 773858 533943 667195 836284 626046 868143 741015 730225 248193 724869 838211 686263 350889 875975 829549 622318 439956 > 4208 [i]