Best Known (95, 95+74, s)-Nets in Base 4
(95, 95+74, 130)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 169, 130)-net over F4, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (95, 178, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 89, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 89, 65)-net over F16, using
(95, 95+74, 189)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (95, 169, 189)-net over F4, using
(95, 95+74, 2716)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 169, 2717)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 567182 144151 150804 554281 868145 634126 638037 178444 799937 900978 801767 385112 004506 524655 183327 248299 586960 > 4169 [i]