Best Known (199−75, 199, s)-Nets in Base 4
(199−75, 199, 135)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (124, 199, 135)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 37, 5)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- the rational function field F4(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (87, 162, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 81, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 81, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (0, 37, 5)-net over F4, using
(199−75, 199, 356)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (124, 199, 356)-net over F4, using
(199−75, 199, 8109)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (124, 199, 8110)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (124, 198, 8110)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 161593 955024 542385 013112 663036 989268 370802 344716 694360 492794 215033 540505 000488 842034 828227 635020 042635 936028 389970 006625 > 4198 [i]