Best Known (205−77, 205, s)-Nets in Base 4
(205−77, 205, 139)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (128, 205, 139)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 39, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (89, 166, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 83, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 83, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 39, 9)-net over F4, using
(205−77, 205, 369)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (128, 205, 369)-net over F4, using
(205−77, 205, 8515)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (128, 205, 8516)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (128, 204, 8516)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 662 591359 954725 850814 872225 195683 413840 577897 620296 234936 983768 621673 055545 121817 288922 023035 118610 300380 768699 563964 052240 > 4204 [i]