Best Known (129, 129+79, s)-Nets in Base 4
(129, 129+79, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (129, 208, 137)-net over F4, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 211, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 56, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 155, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 56, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(129, 129+79, 360)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (129, 208, 360)-net over F4, using
(129, 129+79, 8019)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (129, 208, 8020)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (129, 207, 8020)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 42490 161023 551140 977893 224483 055436 909694 894773 316865 683523 788145 947929 211835 680164 161725 872747 753626 142455 174157 674052 541160 > 4207 [i]