Best Known (215−81, 215, s)-Nets in Base 4
(215−81, 215, 139)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (134, 215, 139)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 41, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (93, 174, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 87, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 87, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 41, 9)-net over F4, using
(215−81, 215, 381)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (134, 215, 381)-net over F4, using
(215−81, 215, 8710)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (134, 215, 8711)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (134, 214, 8711)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 693 723232 305714 171353 353910 332085 456042 695047 194289 142430 020728 501087 456782 701763 370700 628628 032676 077832 634761 298511 579205 332800 > 4214 [i]