Best Known (116−82, 116, s)-Nets in Base 4
(116−82, 116, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 116, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 116, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(116−82, 116, 65)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (34, 116, 65)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 116, 65)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
(116−82, 116, 208)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (34, 116, 209)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4116, 209, F4, 82) (dual of [209, 93, 83]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(4115, 144, S4, 82), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 809384 318048 793962 648861 468486 632853 295185 954954 708490 452357 715816 889075 089941 955770 056704 / 950 296664 568803 286553 > 4115 [i]
- OA(493, 209, S4, 65), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(493, 148, S4, 65), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 31410 303083 703049 377310 817051 099884 117194 259592 068916 365914 768905 433278 533937 431277 207276 796100 647129 523955 480347 541504 / 271 727597 647736 395513 057790 697511 115852 689190 837400 656430 005393 > 493 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(493, 148, S4, 65), but
- OA(4115, 144, S4, 82), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
(116−82, 116, 239)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 116, 240)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 7340 566728 744543 186578 249241 522925 991484 586465 678236 031165 098079 226305 > 4116 [i]