Best Known (244−83, 244, s)-Nets in Base 4
(244−83, 244, 200)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 244, 200)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (161, 199)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 161 and N(F) ≥ 200, using
- F7 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 161 and N(F) ≥ 200, using
(244−83, 244, 240)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(161, 244, 240)-net in base 4, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (161, 250, 240)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (36, 125, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 100, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 100, 120)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (36, 125, 120)-net in base 16, using
(244−83, 244, 609)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (161, 244, 609)-net over F4, using
(244−83, 244, 19877)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 244, 19878)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (161, 243, 19878)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 199 956336 265305 786334 967944 689569 983574 882033 954392 638736 926169 555059 884689 334404 252556 595121 687508 841080 818757 220500 493733 625254 804923 903416 301520 > 4243 [i]