Best Known (216−85, 216, s)-Nets in Base 4
(216−85, 216, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (131, 216, 137)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (131, 217, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 58, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 159, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 58, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(216−85, 216, 330)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (131, 216, 330)-net over F4, using
(216−85, 216, 6613)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (131, 216, 6614)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (131, 215, 6614)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2790 108249 781579 311097 184665 921823 472648 416529 045735 187158 290165 392318 010118 790014 066589 410791 442714 842067 779952 613896 089629 124920 > 4215 [i]