Best Known (219−85, 219, s)-Nets in Base 4
(219−85, 219, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (134, 219, 137)-net over F4, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (134, 226, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 61, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 165, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 61, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(219−85, 219, 350)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (134, 219, 350)-net over F4, using
(219−85, 219, 7304)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (134, 219, 7305)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (134, 218, 7305)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 177522 074773 551043 806068 252551 436125 021499 031104 240932 829750 288081 711180 658126 013040 375117 541359 693761 162593 410849 304978 468577 006720 > 4218 [i]