Best Known (220−85, 220, s)-Nets in Base 4
(220−85, 220, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (135, 220, 137)-net over F4, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (135, 229, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 62, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 167, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 62, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(220−85, 220, 357)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (135, 220, 357)-net over F4, using
(220−85, 220, 7551)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (135, 220, 7552)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (135, 219, 7552)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 712872 218620 235289 170615 741204 961413 637651 953406 021330 039372 482151 694080 753891 608417 066663 087752 631063 974744 076416 917569 943497 944525 > 4219 [i]