Best Known (248−85, 248, s)-Nets in Base 4
(248−85, 248, 200)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (163, 248, 200)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (161, 248, 200)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (161, 199)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 161 and N(F) ≥ 200, using
- F7 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 161 and N(F) ≥ 200, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (161, 199)-sequence over F4, using
(248−85, 248, 240)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(163, 248, 240)-net in base 4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (161, 248, 240)-net in base 4, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (161, 250, 240)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (36, 125, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 100, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 100, 120)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (36, 125, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (161, 250, 240)-net in base 4, using
(248−85, 248, 602)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (163, 248, 602)-net over F4, using
(248−85, 248, 19080)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (163, 248, 19081)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (163, 247, 19081)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 51237 691026 551052 173851 305584 569878 127317 600352 620071 217607 008244 577561 142876 157217 395977 254653 460060 395990 479247 651768 314737 447855 155434 829863 681664 > 4247 [i]