Best Known (35, 35+87, s)-Nets in Base 4
(35, 35+87, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 122, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 122, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(35, 35+87, 65)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (35, 122, 65)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 122, 65)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
(35, 35+87, 188)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (35, 122, 189)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4122, 189, F4, 87) (dual of [189, 67, 88]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(4121, 145, S4, 87), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 241502 590268 189986 517960 819451 991263 770225 532833 261695 725476 600361 862422 859217 680809 852928 / 21697 738822 577169 > 4121 [i]
- OA(467, 189, S4, 44), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(467, 185, S4, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 27 922736 614479 963563 498030 039555 280180 497392 114764 937434 686895 163379 799248 329552 391127 539087 989670 936576 / 1212 198916 755108 948361 633672 026124 789528 916769 954260 490443 945723 > 467 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(467, 185, S4, 44), but
- OA(4121, 145, S4, 87), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
(35, 35+87, 244)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 122, 245)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 121, 245)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 7 541460 917145 996894 414259 569307 018077 224813 619796 000852 360038 123435 454552 > 4121 [i]