Best Known (36, 36+88, s)-Nets in Base 4
(36, 36+88, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 124, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 124, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(36, 36+88, 65)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (36, 124, 65)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 124, 65)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
(36, 36+88, 209)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (36, 124, 210)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4124, 210, F4, 88) (dual of [210, 86, 89]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(4123, 150, S4, 88), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 22915 666113 439092 609099 444232 414491 754857 959622 104295 992957 494311 648680 329878 580928 609806 974976 / 136 168406 561048 662801 > 4123 [i]
- OA(486, 210, S4, 60), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(486, 145, S4, 60), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 70 960269 863126 606518 991667 215730 563206 075021 389069 425781 018295 735734 868068 159984 954116 355960 140231 669388 460318 751919 101866 886859 928826 023614 873600 / 11532 795767 709720 554647 969916 716816 544438 820799 421172 775769 384715 477815 805045 795696 528849 736837 > 486 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(486, 145, S4, 60), but
- OA(4123, 150, S4, 88), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
(36, 36+88, 251)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 124, 252)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 482 914408 740394 517158 583005 380335 490356 741743 841311 794512 345787 846610 298884 > 4124 [i]