Best Known (138, 138+89, s)-Nets in Base 4
(138, 138+89, 138)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 227, 138)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 65, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 162, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (21, 65, 34)-net over F4, using
(138, 138+89, 349)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (138, 227, 349)-net over F4, using
(138, 138+89, 7079)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 227, 7080)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (138, 226, 7080)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 11678 207400 165079 539687 289813 878243 535598 215537 033249 601564 626944 514857 376093 559146 533462 942721 365309 715958 361679 425838 806752 310350 240272 > 4226 [i]