Best Known (162, 162+89, s)-Nets in Base 4
(162, 162+89, 200)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 251, 200)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (161, 251, 200)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (161, 199)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 161 and N(F) ≥ 200, using
- F7 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 161 and N(F) ≥ 200, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (161, 199)-sequence over F4, using
(162, 162+89, 240)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(162, 251, 240)-net in base 4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on (161, 250, 240)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (36, 125, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 100, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 100, 120)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (36, 125, 120)-net in base 16, using
(162, 162+89, 540)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (162, 251, 540)-net over F4, using
(162, 162+89, 15120)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 251, 15121)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 250, 15121)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3 280102 271076 479140 361770 710345 204395 915215 465445 807683 291417 294578 186073 001890 908611 938144 268192 660539 844263 237417 001927 326056 940805 604359 517618 590176 > 4250 [i]