Best Known (25, 25+9, s)-Nets in Base 4
(25, 25+9, 514)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 34, 514)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 17, 257)-net over F16, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(8,256) in PG(16,16)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(8,256) in PG(16,16)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 257)-net over F256, using
(25, 25+9, 772)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (25, 34, 772)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(434, 772, F4, 9) (dual of [772, 738, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(434, 1031, F4, 9) (dual of [1031, 997, 10]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,4]) ⊂ C([0,2]) [i] based on
- linear OA(431, 1025, F4, 9) (dual of [1025, 994, 10]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1025 | 410−1, defining interval I = [0,4], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−4,−3,…,4}|+1 = 10 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(421, 1025, F4, 5) (dual of [1025, 1004, 6]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1025 | 410−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−4,−2,0,2,4}|+1 = 6 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- construction X applied to C([0,4]) ⊂ C([0,2]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(434, 1031, F4, 9) (dual of [1031, 997, 10]-code), using
(25, 25+9, 68376)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 34, 68377)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (25, 33, 68377)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 73 788032 037158 226274 > 433 [i]