Best Known (45, 45+9, s)-Nets in Base 4
(45, 45+9, 16394)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 54, 16394)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 5, 10)-net over F4, using
- digital (40, 49, 16384)-net over F4, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(449, 16384, F4, 9, 9) (dual of [(16384, 9), 147407, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 4-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(449, 65537, F4, 9) (dual of [65537, 65488, 10]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65537 | 416−1, defining interval I = [0,4], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−4,−3,…,4}|+1 = 10 (BCH-bound) [i]
- OOA 4-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(449, 65537, F4, 9) (dual of [65537, 65488, 10]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(449, 16384, F4, 9, 9) (dual of [(16384, 9), 147407, 10]-NRT-code), using
(45, 45+9, 40757)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (45, 54, 40757)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(454, 40757, F4, 9) (dual of [40757, 40703, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(454, 65548, F4, 9) (dual of [65548, 65494, 10]-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(454, 65548, F4, 9) (dual of [65548, 65494, 10]-code), using
(45, 45+9, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 54, large)-net in base 4, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield (45, 47, large)-net in base 4, but