Best Known (228−91, 228, s)-Nets in Base 4
(228−91, 228, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (137, 228, 137)-net over F4, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (137, 235, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 64, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 171, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 64, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(228−91, 228, 331)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (137, 228, 331)-net over F4, using
(228−91, 228, 6362)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (137, 228, 6363)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (137, 227, 6363)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 46826 751414 489773 321634 989312 641207 706235 439459 748513 525877 497619 002208 988728 089128 615734 160451 385151 459164 983610 082184 168949 733773 018736 > 4227 [i]