Best Known (229−91, 229, s)-Nets in Base 4
(229−91, 229, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 229, 137)-net over F4, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (138, 238, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 65, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 173, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 65, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(229−91, 229, 337)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (138, 229, 337)-net over F4, using
(229−91, 229, 6562)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 229, 6563)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (138, 228, 6563)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 187019 617446 550100 451803 836543 593305 406928 488330 895071 434564 341200 001143 477156 045439 323781 170573 833625 946840 999076 799180 428751 519365 425600 > 4228 [i]