Best Known (242−91, 242, s)-Nets in Base 4
(242−91, 242, 160)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (151, 242, 160)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (33, 78, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 164, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (33, 78, 56)-net over F4, using
(242−91, 242, 425)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (151, 242, 425)-net over F4, using
(242−91, 242, 9812)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (151, 242, 9813)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (151, 241, 9813)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 12 507472 897321 134560 291269 850953 602351 144202 763060 837681 239660 713925 951536 442658 763804 694802 235841 361198 086550 767628 228252 183362 215311 049841 218640 > 4241 [i]