Best Known (138, 138+93, s)-Nets in Base 4
(138, 138+93, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 231, 137)-net over F4, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (138, 238, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 65, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 173, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 65, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(138, 138+93, 325)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (138, 231, 325)-net over F4, using
(138, 138+93, 6105)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 231, 6106)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (138, 230, 6106)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2 984918 476977 255669 411494 687578 113599 830283 084460 114527 783652 446419 860765 986129 882858 326197 362124 352296 136537 816950 912029 136495 460917 910576 > 4230 [i]