Best Known (153, 153+95, s)-Nets in Base 4
(153, 153+95, 160)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (153, 248, 160)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (33, 80, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 168, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (33, 80, 56)-net over F4, using
(153, 153+95, 408)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (153, 248, 408)-net over F4, using
(153, 153+95, 8894)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (153, 248, 8895)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (153, 247, 8895)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 51319 607490 472951 678842 215835 304387 120278 017677 640099 327958 649571 792849 708714 940676 502569 897149 141461 531141 915828 755517 170883 466053 358865 433737 695436 > 4247 [i]