Best Known (251−97, 251, s)-Nets in Base 4
(251−97, 251, 160)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (154, 251, 160)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (33, 81, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 170, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (33, 81, 56)-net over F4, using
(251−97, 251, 401)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (154, 251, 401)-net over F4, using
(251−97, 251, 8499)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (154, 251, 8500)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (154, 250, 8500)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3 284720 162493 895777 004845 505703 206671 746057 957880 845929 492174 467805 875523 719508 802593 283206 937128 944452 308019 737799 779232 910378 769474 503077 805093 648321 > 4250 [i]