Best Known (141, 141+99, s)-Nets in Base 4
(141, 141+99, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (141, 240, 137)-net over F4, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (141, 247, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 68, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 179, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 68, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(141, 141+99, 311)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (141, 240, 311)-net over F4, using
(141, 141+99, 5464)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (141, 240, 5465)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (141, 239, 5465)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 781265 225877 563070 644992 353979 401169 873283 466754 657625 149339 993125 822506 000979 433192 914084 825179 552077 724005 328381 453529 602269 704467 464825 603528 > 4239 [i]