Best Known (160, 160+99, s)-Nets in Base 4
(160, 160+99, 160)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 259, 160)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (157, 259, 160)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (33, 84, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 175, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (33, 84, 56)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(160, 160+99, 428)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (160, 259, 428)-net over F4, using
(160, 160+99, 9383)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 259, 9384)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (160, 258, 9384)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 215262 833994 190753 182398 400171 853532 966769 876883 568094 275185 523591 721099 378066 431817 414549 205430 294574 223815 287827 048207 253046 829024 633241 981601 336200 513224 > 4258 [i]