Best Known (68, 105, s)-Nets in Base 4
(68, 105, 139)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 105, 139)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 19, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (49, 86, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 43, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 43, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 19, 9)-net over F4, using
(68, 105, 263)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (68, 105, 263)-net over F4, using
(68, 105, 7563)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 105, 7564)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (68, 104, 7564)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 411 461378 986202 597048 373298 875977 837219 876837 387717 570471 941960 > 4104 [i]