Best Known (89, 122, s)-Nets in Base 4
(89, 122, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 122, 531)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 123, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 41, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 41, 177)-net over F64, using
(89, 122, 904)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (89, 122, 904)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4122, 904, F4, 33) (dual of [904, 782, 34]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4122, 1030, F4, 33) (dual of [1030, 908, 34]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(32) ⊂ Ce(30) [i] based on
- linear OA(4121, 1024, F4, 33) (dual of [1024, 903, 34]-code), using an extension Ce(32) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 45−1, defining interval I = [1,32], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
- linear OA(4116, 1024, F4, 31) (dual of [1024, 908, 32]-code), using an extension Ce(30) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 45−1, defining interval I = [1,30], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- linear OA(41, 6, F4, 1) (dual of [6, 5, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(41, s, F4, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(32) ⊂ Ce(30) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4122, 1030, F4, 33) (dual of [1030, 908, 34]-code), using
(89, 122, 80989)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 122, 80990)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 121, 80990)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 7 068443 220599 892192 244021 249513 213904 947773 986947 600193 104067 353391 049535 > 4121 [i]