Best Known (35, 129, s)-Nets in Base 4
(35, 129, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(35, 129, 65)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (35, 129, 65)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 129, 65)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
(35, 129, 145)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 129, 146)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 128, 146)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4128, 146, S4, 93), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 278138 826057 886185 243354 511782 966260 650098 300721 458938 504666 442284 028621 359345 744239 132672 / 1 630392 203869 > 4128 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4128, 146, S4, 93), but