Best Known (87, 130, s)-Nets in Base 4
(87, 130, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (87, 130, 195)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (86, 129, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 43, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 43, 65)-net over F64, using
(87, 130, 208)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(87, 130, 208)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (22, 65, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 52, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 52, 104)-net over F32, using
(87, 130, 395)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (87, 130, 395)-net over F4, using
(87, 130, 14428)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (87, 130, 14429)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (87, 129, 14429)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 463337 425644 644440 092063 772450 243521 851450 853317 075967 958675 268343 568485 233788 > 4129 [i]