Best Known (96, 131, s)-Nets in Base 4
(96, 131, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 131, 531)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 131, 531)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (95, 132, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 44, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 44, 177)-net over F64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (95, 132, 531)-net over F4, using
(96, 131, 1008)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (96, 131, 1008)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4131, 1008, F4, 35) (dual of [1008, 877, 36]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4131, 1023, F4, 35) (dual of [1023, 892, 36]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 45−1, defining interval I = [0,34], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 36 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4131, 1023, F4, 35) (dual of [1023, 892, 36]-code), using
(96, 131, 96105)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 131, 96106)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 130, 96106)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 1 852682 972080 992969 177346 292371 980410 462471 360192 542736 890552 612193 016337 360138 > 4130 [i]