Best Known (116, 132, s)-Nets in Base 4
(116, 132, 524288)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 132, 524288)-net over F4, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(4132, 524288, F4, 16, 16) (dual of [(524288, 16), 8388476, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(4132, 4194304, F4, 16) (dual of [4194304, 4194172, 17]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(4133, 4194305, F4, 17) (dual of [4194305, 4194172, 18]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4194305 | 422−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,8}|+1 = 18 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(4133, 4194305, F4, 17) (dual of [4194305, 4194172, 18]-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(4132, 4194304, F4, 16) (dual of [4194304, 4194172, 17]-code), using
(116, 132, 1980992)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (116, 132, 1980992)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(4132, 1980992, F4, 2, 16) (dual of [(1980992, 2), 3961852, 17]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(4132, 2097152, F4, 2, 16) (dual of [(2097152, 2), 4194172, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(4132, 4194304, F4, 16) (dual of [4194304, 4194172, 17]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(4133, 4194305, F4, 17) (dual of [4194305, 4194172, 18]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4194305 | 422−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,8}|+1 = 18 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(4133, 4194305, F4, 17) (dual of [4194305, 4194172, 18]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(4132, 4194304, F4, 16) (dual of [4194304, 4194172, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(4132, 2097152, F4, 2, 16) (dual of [(2097152, 2), 4194172, 17]-NRT-code), using
(116, 132, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 132, large)-net in base 4, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (116, 118, large)-net in base 4, but