Best Known (91, 136, s)-Nets in Base 4
(91, 136, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 136, 195)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (90, 135, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 45, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 45, 65)-net over F64, using
(91, 136, 208)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(91, 136, 208)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (23, 68, 104)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (23, 70, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 56, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 56, 104)-net over F32, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (23, 70, 104)-net in base 16, using
(91, 136, 409)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (91, 136, 409)-net over F4, using
(91, 136, 14916)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 136, 14917)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 135, 14917)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 1898 034595 147431 630423 428475 844675 693239 083478 801602 148900 174213 828933 878956 497760 > 4135 [i]