Best Known (92, 138, s)-Nets in Base 4
(92, 138, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 138, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 46, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
(92, 138, 208)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(92, 138, 208)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (23, 69, 104)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (23, 70, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 56, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 56, 104)-net over F32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (23, 70, 104)-net in base 16, using
(92, 138, 402)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (92, 138, 402)-net over F4, using
(92, 138, 12854)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 138, 12855)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 121461 407916 427905 300205 107404 093988 317826 878859 869023 958446 981868 378570 124639 131236 > 4138 [i]