Best Known (105, 143, s)-Nets in Base 4
(105, 143, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 143, 531)-net over F4, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (105, 147, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 49, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 49, 177)-net over F64, using
(105, 143, 1063)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (105, 143, 1063)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4143, 1063, F4, 38) (dual of [1063, 920, 39]-code), using
- 32 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 9 times 0, 1, 21 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(4141, 1029, F4, 38) (dual of [1029, 888, 39]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(37) ⊂ Ce(36) [i] based on
- linear OA(4141, 1024, F4, 38) (dual of [1024, 883, 39]-code), using an extension Ce(37) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 45−1, defining interval I = [1,37], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 38 [i]
- linear OA(4136, 1024, F4, 37) (dual of [1024, 888, 38]-code), using an extension Ce(36) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 45−1, defining interval I = [1,36], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 37 [i]
- linear OA(40, 5, F4, 0) (dual of [5, 5, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(40, s, F4, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(37) ⊂ Ce(36) [i] based on
- 32 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 9 times 0, 1, 21 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(4141, 1029, F4, 38) (dual of [1029, 888, 39]-code), using
(105, 143, 89807)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 143, 89808)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 124 337837 735756 768433 553542 767740 824281 758137 972951 106435 596149 643417 526366 095047 427628 > 4143 [i]