Best Known (108, 147, s)-Nets in Base 4
(108, 147, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (108, 147, 531)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (107, 147, 531)-net over F4, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (107, 150, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 50, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 50, 177)-net over F64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (107, 150, 531)-net over F4, using
(108, 147, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(108, 147, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (10, 49, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 42, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 42, 192)-net over F128, using
(108, 147, 1087)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (108, 147, 1087)-net over F4, using
(108, 147, 111786)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (108, 147, 111787)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (108, 146, 111787)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 7957 481540 135615 185437 789449 542029 764167 927983 549122 991523 777324 160329 516270 316102 733640 > 4146 [i]