Best Known (115, 156, s)-Nets in Base 4
(115, 156, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (115, 156, 531)-net over F4, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (115, 162, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 54, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 54, 177)-net over F64, using
(115, 156, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(115, 156, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (11, 52, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (11, 56, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 48, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 48, 192)-net over F128, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (11, 56, 192)-net in base 64, using
(115, 156, 1191)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (115, 156, 1191)-net over F4, using
(115, 156, 128261)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (115, 156, 128262)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (115, 155, 128262)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2086 196981 469466 955142 815551 854531 029744 644531 112112 296603 869713 007043 922366 741581 625959 918896 > 4155 [i]