Best Known (135, 168, s)-Nets in Base 4
(135, 168, 1094)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (135, 168, 1094)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (20, 36, 66)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 33)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 33)-net over F16, using
- digital (99, 132, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 33, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 33, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (20, 36, 66)-net over F4, using
(135, 168, 6190)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (135, 168, 6190)-net over F4, using
(135, 168, 4359305)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (135, 168, 4359306)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (135, 167, 4359306)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 34996 017240 066321 548107 222846 887882 933591 559164 530553 497548 552909 103613 108265 167540 544990 659210 428392 > 4167 [i]