Best Known (145, 180, s)-Nets in Base 4
(145, 180, 1104)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 180, 1104)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (23, 40, 76)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 20, 38)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 20, 38)-net over F16, using
- digital (105, 140, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (23, 40, 76)-net over F4, using
(145, 180, 6963)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (145, 180, 6963)-net over F4, using
(145, 180, 5225891)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 180, 5225892)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 179, 5225892)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 587136 982539 073717 813890 696473 080000 858477 941809 153086 048210 206740 436805 773315 073217 144647 104660 619615 211590 > 4179 [i]